Remixing My Self (Again) -- Avatar Version
The exhibition catalog for my current retrospective in Athens, which can be purchased by sending an email to [protocol@emst.gr], has a lot of color images including a still of my avatar standing in front of a scene from Society of the Spectacle (A Digital Remix) while the work is looping as part of an exhibition in Second Life:
What does my avatar think is happening when it stands before a work of art that its earthly other has remixed for this virtually internetworked space of flows?
If this virtually rendered and confident young stud represents me or the current version thereof, then does it think what I think or is it just a dense collection of data manifested as pixels performing its awkward dance of simulated image-nothingness, where what is ultimately rendered is a programmable entity that simulates an aesthetic encounter?
Ah, but that can be "me" too, yes?
(Note to avatar: am I or am I not going to Art Miami this year? Answer: not going.)
Can this programmable and simulated aesthetic encounter also be experienced by -- what in META/DATA -- I call the "not-me" i.e. "that pseudoautobiographical flux identity I am constantly portraying while I improvise my life fiction in asynchronous realtime"?
Not to get too tongue-tied here, but according to a prior post, these oscillating personas create multiple layers of experience for the postproduction medium to parallel process in:
In digital cultures, this tradition of finding or having been found by ones "unconscious creative potential" can be rendered as a formal experiment in the creation of an even richer co-poietic network potential, one where "going with the flow" is feeling w-r-i-t-e. (Burroughs: "Anybody can make cut-ups. It is experimental in the sense of being something to do. Right here write now.")
Summoning the ghosts of Burroughs - McLuhan - Williams - Olson - and Ornette Coleman - I have no choice but to say
We don't even really have to be aware of our past influences while we participate in these "primary bursts of creativity immersed in their own remixological potential." They reside in the body like a second -- or third or fourth -- nature, something that enables us to "play ourselves" without having to think about it. But where these creative potentia reside in our bodies is another story. As far as I can tell, there is no advanced biophotonic imaging technology on the market that can come close to visualizing our past influences in any concrete way, so we are left to our imagination, our dreams, our advanced mnemonic devices triggering neural fireworks in the thick of body-brain-apparatus achievements. My experience in making art across the medium spectrum suggests to me that the subjective events we process while we tap into our unconscious readiness potential are themselves the only creative acts worth investing in, and that they are generated by an ongoing sequence of embedded remixological styles, styles that organically mature via a process of innovation that pervades the structure of contemporary myth-making, something I became hyperaware of while enjoying many aspects of urbanized Greek culture last week.
The contemporary art world programs its own origins as well as the significance of its own cult and ritual practices. I once created an art+language piece entitled "How To Be An Internet Artist" that opened:
Narrative mythology is an ancient literary form that can be updated for digitally-networked culture and has the potential to become the most prominent art form of the 21st century. This may sound crazy but most people thought I was going off the deep end in 1993-94 when I began touting the end of print publishing and the rise of network publishing. Of course, this new media artist who excels at the art of narrative mythologizing will require a hybridized skills set, particularly literary skills, visual art skills, performance art skills, a cinematic imagination, and a bit of entrepreneurialism mixed in with a healthy dose of post-Marxist creative hactivism (these things are not as mutually exclusive as we might like to think).
In the old days (like 2001), digital artists were teased about their methodologies. We were told that we don't make real things and that real artists use their hands to make real things that will survive as objects to help verify the truth of an art object's existence. Seriously, I heard that kind of pretentious criticism all of the time. But I did not hear anything close to that in Athens last week at the museum opening.
I wonder what Hermes would think of all of this talk about real artists using their hands to make real things?
As a guide to the underworld, he knew that the artist was the medium was the message.
Metadata: remix, source material, writing, performance, art, postproduction, avatar as the new self
What does my avatar think is happening when it stands before a work of art that its earthly other has remixed for this virtually internetworked space of flows?
If this virtually rendered and confident young stud represents me or the current version thereof, then does it think what I think or is it just a dense collection of data manifested as pixels performing its awkward dance of simulated image-nothingness, where what is ultimately rendered is a programmable entity that simulates an aesthetic encounter?
Ah, but that can be "me" too, yes?
(Note to avatar: am I or am I not going to Art Miami this year? Answer: not going.)
Can this programmable and simulated aesthetic encounter also be experienced by -- what in META/DATA -- I call the "not-me" i.e. "that pseudoautobiographical flux identity I am constantly portraying while I improvise my life fiction in asynchronous realtime"?
Not to get too tongue-tied here, but according to a prior post, these oscillating personas create multiple layers of experience for the postproduction medium to parallel process in:
But whose pseudo-autobiographical story is it, really?Perhaps the "not-me" is really a postproduction medium operating in asynchronous realtime and, as such, can only be accessed via an unconscious creative potential that participates in a co-poietic unfolding. This issue comes up in the artist interview included in the UNREALTIME catalog.
Mine?
Remixologically postproducing the source material that I select so as to create another version of myself as who?
The artist as technologically mediated filter / affective agent of remixology / postproduction writing machine / intersubjective jam persona who "plays to play"?
In digital cultures, this tradition of finding or having been found by ones "unconscious creative potential" can be rendered as a formal experiment in the creation of an even richer co-poietic network potential, one where "going with the flow" is feeling w-r-i-t-e. (Burroughs: "Anybody can make cut-ups. It is experimental in the sense of being something to do. Right here write now.")
Summoning the ghosts of Burroughs - McLuhan - Williams - Olson - and Ornette Coleman - I have no choice but to say
(Capturing) Source Material Everywhere --Source material is not just data for data's sake either. Nor is it just hackworthy computer code in an open source environment that the programmer can manipulate to alter the functionality of the program. Source material can be found within interpersonal relationships via the body language gestures of those who we used to or still hang out with as well as the stylistic tendencies these same people have revealed to us through their various artworks. David Antin, in what it means to be avant-garde:
A Total Field (of Action) --
(Projecting) Composition By Field --
(Remixed Personas) Play to Play.
the best you can do depends upon what you have to do and where / and if you have to invent something new to do the work at hand you will / but not if you have a ready-made that will work and is close at hand and you want to get on with the rest of the business / then youll pick up the tool thats there / a tool that somebody else has made that will work / and youll lean on it and feel grateful when its good to you / and youll think of him as a friend who would borrow as freely from you if he thought of it or needed to / because there is a community of artists / who dont recognize copyrights and patents / or shouldnt / except under unusual circumstances / who send each other tools in the mail or exchange them in conversations in a barThese "friends" are crucial spigots of source material and when added with the free flowing excess of our simultaneous and continuous mash-up of cultural influences that endlessly spur us on to actively participate in a social network of collaborators (creative co-conspirators), we start feeling ourselves awash in an amniotic fluid where it's only natural to experience a kind of body-brain-apparatus achievement while composing on-the-fly remixological discourses in asynchronous realtime. Thanks to the core group of people I was hanging out with in Athens last week, one could say I was swimming in it -- living in unrealtime (to stay on message).
We don't even really have to be aware of our past influences while we participate in these "primary bursts of creativity immersed in their own remixological potential." They reside in the body like a second -- or third or fourth -- nature, something that enables us to "play ourselves" without having to think about it. But where these creative potentia reside in our bodies is another story. As far as I can tell, there is no advanced biophotonic imaging technology on the market that can come close to visualizing our past influences in any concrete way, so we are left to our imagination, our dreams, our advanced mnemonic devices triggering neural fireworks in the thick of body-brain-apparatus achievements. My experience in making art across the medium spectrum suggests to me that the subjective events we process while we tap into our unconscious readiness potential are themselves the only creative acts worth investing in, and that they are generated by an ongoing sequence of embedded remixological styles, styles that organically mature via a process of innovation that pervades the structure of contemporary myth-making, something I became hyperaware of while enjoying many aspects of urbanized Greek culture last week.
The contemporary art world programs its own origins as well as the significance of its own cult and ritual practices. I once created an art+language piece entitled "How To Be An Internet Artist" that opened:
(It has since been collected here and here and was the title to my 2001-2002 retrospective at the ICA in London)
- Create a fictional identity.
- Begin the branding process by turning this fictional identity into your domain name.
- Register your domain name and set up an account with an Internet service provider (ISP).
- Build a site-specific narrative mythology out of bits of data and then use the ISP to distribute this data to the niche markets that are waiting to form (digitally converge).
Narrative mythology is an ancient literary form that can be updated for digitally-networked culture and has the potential to become the most prominent art form of the 21st century. This may sound crazy but most people thought I was going off the deep end in 1993-94 when I began touting the end of print publishing and the rise of network publishing. Of course, this new media artist who excels at the art of narrative mythologizing will require a hybridized skills set, particularly literary skills, visual art skills, performance art skills, a cinematic imagination, and a bit of entrepreneurialism mixed in with a healthy dose of post-Marxist creative hactivism (these things are not as mutually exclusive as we might like to think).
In the old days (like 2001), digital artists were teased about their methodologies. We were told that we don't make real things and that real artists use their hands to make real things that will survive as objects to help verify the truth of an art object's existence. Seriously, I heard that kind of pretentious criticism all of the time. But I did not hear anything close to that in Athens last week at the museum opening.
I wonder what Hermes would think of all of this talk about real artists using their hands to make real things?
As a guide to the underworld, he knew that the artist was the medium was the message.
Metadata: remix, source material, writing, performance, art, postproduction, avatar as the new self
posted by Professor VJ at 7:30 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home